You are losing up to ten percent of your collections if payer underpayments are not being aggressively pursued by your outsourced medical billing company. It is simply a minimum requirement of being in business that medical billing services compare your payments to the amounts your payers have agreed to pay you.
Any medical billing process must include features that are specifically designed to counteract the actions taken by payers to withhold money from medical practices and facilities. Examples of these features include: comparing claims to payers adjudication rules before submission, calling on submitted claims that have not been denied or paid, posting all payment information - including denials, pursuing underpayments, and using predictive payment estimates in the patient collection process.
Pursuing underpayments is the focus of today's article. This pursuit begins first and foremost with comparing the payment information from EOBs to the allowables outlined in the practice's payer contracts. This comparison must be done in an automated manner and cannot rely upon payment posters catching the underpayments on their own.
Payers have adopted underpayment techniques that are too difficult for a payment poster to spot on their own. Medical billing companies can design their process to battle payers underpayment techniques because they have an advantage over individual practices - they see EOBs for a given payer across multiple practices and multiple states. The enhanced scope allows medical billing companies that pay attention to identify patterns that might be overlooked by individual medical practices.
A disturbing pattern that can regularly be seen by a medical billing company that is paying attention is one where a payer will select a set of procedures and underpay this set of procedures across a large number of providers (often by the same amount). This will continue for about 30 days and then the payer will resume paying the procedures at the correct amount and begin underpaying a whole new selection of procedures.
Although the amount of the underpayments may be small ($5 to $15), the totals can be quite large: upwards of a 10 percent net reduction in the payments the payer sends the practice. Despite the magnitude of the total, the constant hopping from CPT to CPT for underpayments and the relatively small amount of the underpayment on any individual claim makes the loss of revenue hard to spot - let alone pursue.
The pattern outlined above is why it is critical that a strategy for pursuing underpayments is not based upon payment posters picking up on the underpayments. Most payment posters will notice a large underpayment, but it is too much to expect them to spot a $5 underpayment.
Identifying and pursuing underpayments can yield big returns for a medical practice (the average practice can increase collections by 7%). Therefore, it is imperative that your billing service is aggressively pursuing these underpayments on your behalf.
After the underpayment has been noticed it must be relentlessly pursued - this is what actually leads to top line improvement for your practice. Even the small underpayments cannot be ignored - to do so will invite larger and more frequent underpayments. Payers are constantly testing their boundaries. If they see that you respond at the first sign of stepping across the boundary they will quickly fall in line and pursue less vigilant targets.
Copyright 2008 by Carl Mays II
Any medical billing process must include features that are specifically designed to counteract the actions taken by payers to withhold money from medical practices and facilities. Examples of these features include: comparing claims to payers adjudication rules before submission, calling on submitted claims that have not been denied or paid, posting all payment information - including denials, pursuing underpayments, and using predictive payment estimates in the patient collection process.
Pursuing underpayments is the focus of today's article. This pursuit begins first and foremost with comparing the payment information from EOBs to the allowables outlined in the practice's payer contracts. This comparison must be done in an automated manner and cannot rely upon payment posters catching the underpayments on their own.
Payers have adopted underpayment techniques that are too difficult for a payment poster to spot on their own. Medical billing companies can design their process to battle payers underpayment techniques because they have an advantage over individual practices - they see EOBs for a given payer across multiple practices and multiple states. The enhanced scope allows medical billing companies that pay attention to identify patterns that might be overlooked by individual medical practices.
A disturbing pattern that can regularly be seen by a medical billing company that is paying attention is one where a payer will select a set of procedures and underpay this set of procedures across a large number of providers (often by the same amount). This will continue for about 30 days and then the payer will resume paying the procedures at the correct amount and begin underpaying a whole new selection of procedures.
Although the amount of the underpayments may be small ($5 to $15), the totals can be quite large: upwards of a 10 percent net reduction in the payments the payer sends the practice. Despite the magnitude of the total, the constant hopping from CPT to CPT for underpayments and the relatively small amount of the underpayment on any individual claim makes the loss of revenue hard to spot - let alone pursue.
The pattern outlined above is why it is critical that a strategy for pursuing underpayments is not based upon payment posters picking up on the underpayments. Most payment posters will notice a large underpayment, but it is too much to expect them to spot a $5 underpayment.
Identifying and pursuing underpayments can yield big returns for a medical practice (the average practice can increase collections by 7%). Therefore, it is imperative that your billing service is aggressively pursuing these underpayments on your behalf.
After the underpayment has been noticed it must be relentlessly pursued - this is what actually leads to top line improvement for your practice. Even the small underpayments cannot be ignored - to do so will invite larger and more frequent underpayments. Payers are constantly testing their boundaries. If they see that you respond at the first sign of stepping across the boundary they will quickly fall in line and pursue less vigilant targets.
Copyright 2008 by Carl Mays II
About the Author:
Carl Mays II, Founder and Chairman of ClaimCare Medical Billing Services, is an expert in the field of medical billing and medical practice management. Carl has been working in the medical field since 1995. Prior to that Carl worked as a mechanical engineer for Boeing. Read more about medical billing companies at ClaimCare's medical billing blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment